Woman moves to court to stop Housing Finance Company from transferring her property.
By Dickson Odhiambo.
August 17, 2018.
Woman moves to court
to stop Housing Finance Company from transferring her property.
A WOMAN has moved to court to stop Housing Finance Company
Kenya Limited from transferring her property within Kisumu’s Kenya-Re Estate.
Peres Odhiambo has moved to the High Court seeking an order
stopping the financial institution from transferring the property Land
Reference Number 15983/192/3 at Kenya Re-Estate in Kisumu to any third party
other than her who is the petitioner in this matter.
Through Lawyer Ken Amondi of Amondi and Company Advocates,
Odhiambo has obtained temporary conservatory orders of injunction stopping the
Housing Finance Company Kenya Limited which is the first respondent in the
matter from transferring the said property.
The Housing Finance Company Kenya Limited which is the first
respondent in the matter is a mortgage finance company which accepts money from
members of the public on deposit repayable on demand or after notice pursuant
to section 2 of the Banking Act Cap 488 Laws of Kenya.
Central Bank of Kenya which is the Second Respondent in the
petition is an independent financial institution established pursuant to
article 231 of the Constitution of Kenya whose functions under section 4A{1}{c}
of the Central Bank of Kenya Act Cap 491 of the Laws of Kenya include the
licensing and supervision of Authorized dealers such as the Housing Finance
Company Kenya Limited.
High Court Duty Judge Justice Jesse Nyaga gave the orders at
Kakamega Court temporarily barring the said financial institution from
transferring the said property until the matter is heard and determined.
The court also ordered that the applicant to serve the
application and the parties appear before the duty judge on this August 30 this
year.
The petitioner has accused the Housing Finance Company Kenya
Limited infringing on her right as a consumer vis a vis fraudulent, reckless
transaction of business by banks.
Her Lawyer Ken Amondi says in the suit filed in the court
that the petitioner has instituted the petition both for herself and in the
interest of the entire fraternity of consumers of banking services who have
fallen victims to fraudulent and reckless transaction of financial institutions
contrary to provisions of the section 11{1} {h} of the Banking Act Cap 488 Laws
of Kenya.
“The petitioner is also instituting this petition in the
public interest in the sense that the public relies on the CBK to make
decisions as to investment in banks and the CBK therefore owes the public a
duty to ensure that the banks it has licensed and it is constitutionally and
statutorily tasked to supervise and operate within the prisms of the set
regulations,” Amondi says in the suit.
The Lawyer says the petitioner who lives in Germany
sometimes while on holiday in Kenya in early 1998 had a keen interest to invest
in and own an accessible property back home which would act as a holiday home
and also an income generating initiative through the provision of the monthly
rent.
He adds that it is on that basis the petitioner took up the
offer to purchase the property Land Reference Number 15983/192/3 at Kenya
Re-Estate in Kisumu based at Migosi area of Kisumu which was on offer by the
Kenya Re-Insurance Corporation Limited as a Vendor for a consideration of shs 2,119,200 and which was to be facilitated by the
Housing Finance Company of Kenya who were the financiers.
ends
Comments
Post a Comment